Form: 10KSB40

July 15, 1999

10KSB40:

Published on July 15, 1999



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---------------------------------------------------------------
FORM 10-KSB
(MARK ONE)

( X ) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999

OR

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-21846

BISHOP EQUITIES, INC.
(Name of Small Business issuer in its charter)

NEVADA 13-3632859
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)


7825 FAY AVENUE, SUITE 200,
LAJOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037
(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE (619) 456-5777

----------------------

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED:
------------------- ---------------------
NONE NONE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:

COMMON STOCK -- $.001 PAR VALUE
(TITLE OF CLASS)


Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No X
--- ---

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. X
---

Revenues of the registrant for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 were $-0-.

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant on March 31, 1999 was approximately
$15,066,521, based upon the closing bid price of the Common Stock, as
reported by the Nasdaq Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board on July 14, 1999.

The number of shares of the Common Stock of the registrant
outstanding as of March 31, 1999 was 2,595,000.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):

Yes No X
---


PART I

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included
in this Form 10-KSB are, or may be deemed to be, "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Such forward-looking statements involve
assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which
may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Bishop Equities,
Inc. (the "Company") to be materially different from any future results,
performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements contained in this Form 10-KSB. Such potential risks and
uncertainties include, without limitation, FDA approval of the Company's
products and other regulations, patent protection on the Company's
proprietary technology, product liability exposure, uncertainty of market
acceptance, competition, technological change, and other risk factors
detailed herein and in other of the Company's filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date
of this Form 10-KSB and the Company assumes no obligation to update the
forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual results could
differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

Bishop Equities, Inc. ("Bishop" or the "Company") was incorporated
in Nevada in April 1991 to provide a public vehicle for participation in a
business transaction through a merger with or acquisition of a private
company. In March 1993, Bishop successfully offered its common stock at $6.00
per share through an initial public offering. In March 1999, Bishop began
doing business as "Aethlon Medical, Inc." The members of the Board of
Directors have adopted a resolution to amend the Company's Articles of
Incorporation to formally change the name of the Company from "Bishop
Equities, Inc." to "Aethlon Medical, Inc.," subject to shareholder approval.

REORGANIZATION; ACQUISITION OF AETHLON AND HEMEX

On March 10, 1999, Bishop executed an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization for the Acquisition of All of the Outstanding Stock (the
"Aethlon Agreement") of Aethlon, Inc., a California corporation ("Aethlon").
Pursuant to the Aethlon Agreement, Aethlon became a majority-owned subsidiary
of the Company.

Also on March 10, 1999, the Company executed an Agreement and Plan
of Reorganization for the Acquisition of All of the Outstanding Stock (the
"Hemex Agreement") of Hemex, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Hemex"). Pursuant
to the Hemex Agreement, Hemex became a majority-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

As of March 31, 1999, the Company has issued 2,083,500 (80%) of the
2,595,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock to the former shareholders of
Aethlon and Hemex.

The Company's business is the development and manufacture of medical
device technologies. The Company intends to build its business in three ways:

- Complete the commercialization of the Hemex product line of
extracorporeal blood purifiers now in clinical trials.
- Develop and exploit new applications of the Hemex platform
technology.
- Continue the strategy of acquiring other medical device
technologies which can be developed and commercialized on an
international basis.

The Company also intends to pursue the acquisition of additional
medical technologies.

THE HEMEX HEMOPURIFIER-TM-

The Hemopurifier-TM- (hereinafter referred to as the "Hemopurifier"
or the "DFO Hemopurifier") is a novel, hollow-fiber cartridge containing an
immobilized antidote for removing toxic material from the blood. The device
is used in extracorporeal circulation systems, which can be similar to those
used in hemodialysis, or any one of the simpler aphresis systems used today.
The first Hemopurifier product to be commercialized is a device designed for
the removal of aluminum. To date, the device has been proven safe in dialysis
patients with aluminum intoxication in a Phase I clinical trial approved by
the U.S. Food and Drug Administrate ("FDA"). Other initial product markets to
be commercialized are Hemopurifiers, which remove iron, lead, and Cisplatin.
The Hemopurifier is protected by patents in the United States, Europe, and
Japan, with additional patents pending. The size of the potential market for
the initial products addressed by the Hemopurifier is estimated by the
Company to be approximately $1.2 billion in the U.S. and $3.6 billion
worldwide. Potential product applications include Hemopurifiers designed to
remove (i) various viruses; (ii) plutonium and other heavy metals; and (iii)
drug overdoses.

ADVANTAGES OF THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE. The clinical advantages offered
by the Hemopurifier device over present treatments are:

1


1) Toxic material can be selectively removed WITHOUT SIDE EFFECTS,
since no substance enters the body. Toxicity of the antidote is
eliminated, because it is immobilized in the device rather than
injected into the patient.

2) Antidotes of GREATER STRENGTH AND EFFECTIVENESS, compared with
antidotes which were sparingly used previously because of their
toxicity, can be used in this device without regard for the side
effects which would occur if the same substance were in the
bloodstream.

3) The device is HIGHLY EFFICIENT. The structure of the Hemopurifier
device provides a large surface area for immobilization of a
relatively large quantity of antidote, allowing exposure to a
large volume of blood in a short period of time.

4) The device is SAFE. In a closed system, the amount of blood
retained by the Hemopurifier device is small. No replacement fluid
is needed, and no blood transfusions are required. As a result,
the risks of volume expansion, blood pressure changes, infections,
and blood incompatibility (inherent in blood transfusions) are
eliminated. Only the targeted toxic materials are removed. All
other blood components remain in the circulation.

5) The device uses well-established extracorporeal applications,
similar to hemodialysis, plasmapheresis, or other types of
transfusion procedures. These methods are widely used in hospitals
and clinics.

APPLICATIONS OF THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE. Development work to date
has focused principally on Hemopurifier devices for the removal of aluminum,
iron, lead, and cisplatin.

Poisoning with aluminum, iron, lead, and platinum are serious
problems for which current treatment methods are unsatisfactory. The need for
new therapeutic approaches in each case is widely recognized. The number of
patients who would benefit from these treatments is estimated to be over one
million per year in the U.S. alone. In many of the targeted conditions,
patient populations are well identified and currently under some form of
treatment, with both patient and physician awaiting the development of more
effective treatment without serious side effects. As a result, the market
penetration of the metal Hemopurifier devices should be relatively quick.

The long-range goal of Hemex is to continue to develop new medical
applications for this novel treatment method. Some of the future applications
include:

1) treatment of poisoning with heavy metals not included above,
including development of specific chelators for the binding of
mercury, cadmium, copper plutonium, and other radioactive
elements;

2) treatment of poisoning with small molecular weight drugs or
chemicals, using specific antibodies against cardioactive drugs
like dioxin and quinine, depressants and sedatives like
barbiturates, addictive analgesics like Darvon, and abused drugs
like cocaine; and

3) improvement of patient management in conditions with circulating
harmful antibodies or antigen-antibody complexes where treatment
may be feasible by specific removal of these proteins.

The priority of pursuing the future applications will be determined
by (i) relative market potential; (ii) technical advances in protein
separation; and (iii) up-to-date reports of therapeutic success with
plasmapheresis in specific diseases. Some of the conditions which may merit
study include various cancers, insulin-dependent diabetes, certain rheumatic
diseases, and hemophilia.

MARKETING STRATEGY

The marketing objective adopted by Hemex management is to establish
the Hemopurifier device as the preferred treatment in the U.S. for each of
the conditions for which the device is designed, and to then expand use of
the device into international markets. The Company intends to use
multi-faceted sales and marketing strategies for penetrating the U.S. market.
Sales and promotional efforts are planned to target distributors, the
prescribing physicians and medical facilities, and patients.

DISTRIBUTORS. The Company plans to hire area-marketing managers to
work with distributor sales forces. In areas of lower population density, the
Company plans to use independent, commissioned sales representatives who work
with a small number of closely aligned products. Their duties will include:

1) Developing product-marketing programs.
2) Training distributor sales forces.
3) Providing sales materials and product updates.
4) Assisting in sales calls to physicians and medical facilities.

PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL FACILITIES. The Company plans to have area
marketing managers visit physicians and hospital/medical practice
administrators, if possible with distributor salesmen who have strong
pre-established relationships with these buyers. In addition, the Company
plans to introduce physicians to the Hemopurifier device at medical society
meetings and through medical journals. The Company plans to have its
representatives attend medical meetings and host information booths.

2

PATIENTS. As consumers take a greater interest in managing their own
health care, the Company believes it will be important to build awareness of
the potential of the Hemopurifier among the patient population. The Company
plans to work with professional public relations firms to promote the
Hemopurifier in newspapers and general interest magazines, as well as in
targeted patient-oriented publications. A strong presence at consumer
association meetings, where interested individuals share information, will
also be pursued. Some of these meetings where the Company will attempt to
make presentations include:

Lead Poisoning Prevention Coalition
Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning --
National and International Conferences
Cooley's Anemia Foundation -- National and
International Conferences

DISTRIBUTION. The Company plans to form strategic alliances with a
small number of significant distributors of those medical products that are
sold to the target buyers. Although distribution rights may be granted on a
geographical or a product line basis, the company intends to avoid
exclusivity which creates dependence on another firm. The Company intends to
look for strategic partners that (i) offer a knowledgeable sales force with
strong relations with the dialysis clinics and other medical facilities Hemex
seeks to penetrate, and (ii) have the financial and physical capacity to
manage inventory and order processing well. For the DFO Hemopurifier device
for aluminum, potential partners include suppliers to the dialysis industry
and large hospital supply companies.

THE MARKETS

GENERAL USE. Treatment with the Hemopurifier device can be in a
hospital or outpatient facility, under the supervision of a physician
experienced in hemodialysis or other extracorporeal procedures. The
prescribing physician would typically be:

HEMOPURIFIER APPLICATION PRESCRIBING PHYSICIAN

Aluminum Removal Nephrologist, Surgeon, Internist,
Orthopedist, Emergency Physician

Iron Removal Hematologist, Pediatrician,
Internist, Emergency Physician,
Nephrologist, Surgeon

Lead Removal Pediatrician, Obstetrician,
Industrial Physician, Family
Physician, Emergency Physician,
Nephrologist

Platinum Removal Oncologist, Internist, Surgeon,
Emergency Physician, Nephrologist

Medical facilities, in the United States targeted for the initial
four Hemopurifier products include:

6,000 Hospitals
2,000 Freestanding Dialysis centers
100 Regional Poison Control Centers

THE MEDICAL NEED FOR THE DFO HEMOPURIFIER. The DFO Hemopurifier,
which removes both aluminum and iron from the blood, is manufactured by
immobilizing the chelator desferrioxamine (DFO) in the cartridge. DFO has
been well established in clinical use as an attractor that binds aluminum and
iron. There are three basic conditions in which DFO therapy is indicated:

1) ALUMINUM INTOXICATION. A segment of patients with End Stage Renal
Disease (ESRD), who are on chronic hemodialysis, have aluminum
toxicity caused by medication which contains aluminum. In 1996,
over 200,000 patients were on hemodialysis in the United States,
of which an estimated 5% have serious levels of aluminum
intoxication. This condition can lead to crippling bone disease,
anemia, and in severe cases brain damage and reduced life
expectancy.

2) IRON OVERLOAD. There are three patient populations in which excess
iron is introduced into the body or absorbed by the body,
resulting in organ damage and early death. In each case, life long
treatment is required.

a) HEREDITARY HEMOCHROMATOSIS: A genetic disorder that
results in excess iron being absorbed by the gut.
Considered the most common of genetic diseases,
hemochromatosis afflicts more than one million people in
the United States alone, and is thought to be the most
under-diagnosed disease in the world.

b) ACQUIRED IRON OVERLOAD: Iron overload is an unavoidable
complication of life-sustaining chronic blood
transfusions. These patients include those with Cooley's
Anemia, about 10% of those with Sickle Cell Disease, and
others with transfusion-dependent anemia like
sideroblastic anemia.

c) ACUTE IRON POISONing: Of approximately 20,000 cases of
iron poisoning from iron-containing vitamin pills reported
annually to Regional Poison Centers, 60% had symptoms
requiring treatment.

3) REPERFUSION INJURY AFTER HEART SURGERY. During open-heart surgery,
external blood circulation is established with a heart-lung
machine to allow the heart to be stopped safely. When blood flow
to the heart is reestablished, reperfusion injury can result from
sudden release of iron

3


accumulated in the heart that may generate oxygen-derived "free
radicals." The use of DFO in controlling this condition has been
the subject of many recent articles.

PRESENT TREATMENT

Although DFO is an effective chelator of both iron and aluminum, its
use is limited because of its serious side-effects. DFO can presently be
administered only by injection. These injections may cause acute allergic
reactions and blood pressure changes and, after chronic administration, may
lead to impairment of hearing and sight. The most dangerous side-effect is
increased susceptibility to lethal fungal infections.

At present, less than 10% of patients requiring iron chelation
therapy worldwide received the widely used chelating drug desferrioxamine
because of its high cost, oral inactivity, and high toxicity. This medical
opinion expresses increasing concern about DFO side-effects, and increasing
reluctance to prescribe this effective drug.

Two devices containing activated charcoal, the Alu-Kart and the
Clark Hemoperfusion System, have been introduced for the removal of aluminum
after the injection of DFO. However, they are rarely prescribed because (a)
they do not eliminate the need for DFO injection, and (b) other detrimental
side-effects were shown when blood cells came into contact with activated
charcoal.

In addition to anticipated cost advantages, the DFO Hemopurifier
device offers significant medical benefits to the patient:

QUALITY OF LIFE. Treatment is highly efficient, allowing
for a single outpatient treatment to substitute for daily therapy. For
example, for Cooley's Anemia patients, treatment may be two to three days per
month in an outpatient setting rather than 12 hours every night on an
infusion pump.

SAFETY. The debilitating and life-threatening
side-effects of DFO are eliminated because desferrioxamine does not enter
the bloodstream of the patient.

EASE OF TREATMENT. Application is convenient for the
patient because treatment is within the existing dialysis process for the
aluminum patient, and within existing transfusion or phlebotomy regimens for
the iron patient.

The Hemopurifier device clearly adds improved treatment
characteristics to lower cost of treatment, relieving medical and financial
burdens for the patient and the third party payer.

THE MEDICAL NEED FOR THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE FOR LEAD

Public health officials say lead poisoning is the number one
environmental threat to children whether they live in public housing or neat,
suburban homes. In addition to widely recognized environmental sources, many
occupations (e.g. battery manufacturing, smelting) result in exposure to high
levels of lead. Workers in these industries may also bring lead into their
homes, exposing their families to lead poisoning.

Lead poisoning can affect virtually all systems of the body,
causing anemia, gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation, vomiting, abdominal
pain), hypertension, damage to the reproductive system (decreased fertility,
increased rate of miscarriage and stillbirth), and central nervous system
damage resulting in loss of coordination, general weakness, and hand and foot
paralysis. In children, lead poisoning interferes with normal growth,
impeding physical and neurological development.

The three segments of the population at greatest risk for lead
poisoning are shown below:

YOUNG CHILDREN. The NHANES III study by the National Center
for Health Statistics found that 1.7 million children under age five have
blood levels high enough to affect cognitive development. Approximately
95,500 were found to have levels at which medical intervention is recommended
by the Center for Disease Control.

PREGNANT WOMEN. According to a recent statement by the
Public Health Service, it is estimated that 22,822 pregnant women have high
blood lead levels, which will result in dangerous exposure to their fetuses.

INDUSTRIAL WORKERS. In 1993, over 587,000 workers were
exposed directly to lead in the workplace. Based on OSHA compliance
inspection data, it is estimated that 195,745 industrial workers have
elevated blood lead levels.

PRESENT TREATMENT

Lead intoxication is presently treated with chelation therapy, in
which a chemical that binds lead is administered to the patient, who
subsequently eliminates the chelator/lead complex through the kidney in the
urine. Lead chelators available for clinical use are: Calcium Disodium
Versenate (EDTA) given intravenously, Dimercaprol (BAL) given
intramuscularly, D-penicillamine and Succimer (DMSA), both given orally. Each
of these drugs has its own side-effects (e.g. hypertension, gastrointestinal
irritation, kidney injury), and must be given under close medical supervision
in a hospital.


4



YOUNG CHILDREN. Chelation Therapy is used very cautiously
in children, depending on the level of intoxication. The most frequently
prescribed chelator, EDTA, is given by infusion in a dilute intravenous
solution over five consecutive days. This process is often repeated two or
three times, with weeklong rests between treatments. Other chelators are
administered to children in the same way.

PREGNANT WOMEN. Although lead poisoning in a mother may
cause neurological damage to her fetus, she is not given chelation therapy
because it is potentially too toxic, and potentially fatal, to the fetus.

INDUSTRIAL WORKERS. Chelation therapy is rarely
administered to industrial workers because of its side-effects. OSHA requires
that workers be removed from the contaminated area, or sent home, until their
lead levels return to acceptable levels. Under current OSHA regulations, the
average time away from work is approximately 100 days, at an average
estimated cost per day of $74, for a total economic impact of approximately
$7,400 per year. The prospect for a long-term illness adds further to the
potential cost for the worker and his employer.

TREATMENT OF LEAD POISONING WITH THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE

Since the chelator is immobilized in the Hemopurifier device, the
binding of lead and chelator takes place outside the body. Lead removal is
achieved without any toxicity; the lead/chelator complex is neither released
into the blood, nor eliminated through the kidney.

Blood lead levels do not reflect the total body burden of lead, as
lead accumulates in the tissues and in bones. During conventional chelation,
lead stored in tissues and bones may be released into the blood, increasing
the potential for damage (eventually a new equilibrium among
blood-tissue-bones will be established). By contrast, the Hemopurifier device
captures the circulating lead as well as the lead released from storage, thus
preventing harm to the kidneys.

The number and frequency of treatments with the Hemopurifier device
will depend upon the amount of total lead in the body, and on potential
re-exposure to the lead source. Re-exposure is a problem for many children
living in homes with lead paint, and for many workers in high lead exposure
industries.

Application of the Hemopurifier device could be in an outpatient
hospital setting, an emergency room, or a dialysis center. A dialysis system,
or a simpler apheresis system used for blood transfusions and plasmapheresis,
is suitable for administration of the Hemopurifier device for the removal of
lead.

In addition to anticipated cost advantages over other treatments,
the Company believes the Hemopurifier offers significant medical benefits to
the patient:

REDUCED TREATMENT TIME. Treatment is efficient, allowing
one outpatient treatment in place of a five-day process. For example,
children with lead poisoning might be treated three times in an outpatient
setting instead of 15 days of traditional chelation therapy.

TREATMENT FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. Because of the safety of the
Hemopurifier, this treatment can be used by pregnant women who heretofore had
no effective means of reducing their blood lead levels.

SAFETY. With no side-effects, the Hemopurifier device
allows safer and more thorough treatment.

THE MEDICAL NEED FOR THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE FOR PLATINUM

Cisplatin is a platinum derivative that is one of the most effective
chemotherapeutic agents for certain types of cancer. However, cisplatin
infusion is typically followed by severe nausea and vomiting. Cisplatin may
deposit in the sensory nerves, resulting in incapacitating levels of pain,
which may last for years after treatment has been discontinued. The dosage of
cisplatin, therefore, is often limited by its toxicity.

PRESENT TREATMENT

There is presently no means of removing cisplatin from the body.
Painkillers and medications that reduce vomiting provide limited relief from
side-effects. An injectable preparation for reducing the acute and chronic
side-effects is reported to be in development.

TREATMENT OF PLATINUM INTOXICATION WITH THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE

The Hemopurifier device for the removal of cisplatin can be applied
to the vein draining the tumor, either during or immediately after cisplatin
treatment. The toxic agent is removed as it exits the tumor, and before it
can invade normal tissue.

Animal tests have demonstrated the effectiveness of this procedure.
In a simulated regional perfusion of the legs of anesthetized dogs, cisplatin
was infused in the femoral artery, and blood leaving the femoral vein was
passed through the Hemopurifier device. The level of cisplatin in the dogs'
blood was reduced significantly.

ADVANTAGE OF THE HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE

Priced at $400 to the patient, it is expected that the Hemopurifier
will be approved by third-party payers for this treatment. The total cost of
treatment are estimated to be:

Cartridge Cost $ 400
Procedure Cost $ 600
Procedures per Year 3
Total Annual Cost $ 3,000


5



Although it offers relatively modest cost, the major benefit offered
by the Hemopurifier Device for cisplatin is that it will allow the
administration of substantially higher doses of cisplatin, thereby increasing
its effectiveness as a chemotherapeutic agent. Since most cisplatin will be
removed immediately after it leaves the tumor, normal tissues will not be
damaged. The patient will receive more effective treatment, and enjoy an
improved quality of life during treatment because of the reduction or
elimination of the debilitating side-effects of cisplatin.

MANUFACTURING

The production of a Hemopurifier device involves two steps: (1)
compounding the chelator in a form that can be immobilized in the cartridge,
and (2) filling the cartridge with the chelator preparation. A standard
Fresenius dialysis cartridge, with minor modifications, is used because of
its relatively low cost and wide availability.

Hemex has contracted with two companies to do scale-up development
of the DFO Hemopurifier for aluminum for the final clinical trial.

One company, located in Buffalo, New York, has extensive experience
in taking chemical products from laboratory formulations to industrial scale
production. This contractor will prepare the chelator for delivery to the
filler.

The second contractor, located in Rochester, New York, is an
FDA-approved facility with a strong record with regulatory agencies. The
company is research-oriented with a good understanding of scale-up
development. They will fill the devices with the prepared chelator, and
package, label, and sterilize the Hemopurifier to FDA specifications.

Beyond meeting the product requirements for clinical trials, there
are three options for manufacturing the DFO Hemopurifier device for the
commercial market:

- continue to subcontract both processes in these or other facilities;

- manufacture the chelator in-house, and contract the filling,
packaging, and sterilization; or

- form a strategic alliance with one competent firm to manufacture the
entire product.

Subcontracting without a strategic partnership exposes technological
secrets to potential competitors, but offers minimal capital investment and
maximum flexibility. It also allows Hemex to bring products to market as
rapidly as possible, perhaps sacrificing some potential profit margin to do
so. Contracting with a strategic partner offers less risk, but involves
surrender of some corporate autonomy and likely some ownership as well.

Hemex management favors using subcontractors in the near and
intermediate term. With the anticipated growth in volume, it is possible that
self-manufacture will become an attractive financial alternative at some
point in the commercial life of the Hemopurifier. In any case, it is unlikely
that Hemex will invest in sterilizing capacity in the plan period, so that
that capital-intensive process will remain with a contractor.

HEMEX RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS

UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION INCUBATOR

Development and in-vitro testing of the Hemopurifier device takes
place at laboratory facilities rented from the Western New York Technology
Center, maintained by the State University of New York at Buffalo.

The employees at this location work under the direction of Dr. Agnes
Stadler. She has a Ph.D. in biotechnology, and an MS in Pharmaceutical
chemistry, from the University of Budapest, Hungary. Before coming to the
U.S., Dr. Stadler headed the Pharmaceutical Group at the Chinoin Research
Center of Chinoin Pharmaceutical Company. She is responsible for developing
the immobilized chelators and the assembly of the Hemopurifier devices.

BUFFALO GENERAL HOSPITAL LABORATORY

Testing of Hemopurifier in recirculation experiments with biological
materials (chiefly human blood) is conducted at the laboratory at the
University-affiliated Buffalo General Hospital. Blood Samples from patients
with disease conditions amenable to treatment with specific Hemopurifier's
are tested in this facility. This unit is headed by Dr. Clara Ambrus.

LABORATORY ANIMAL FACILITIES - SUNY AT BUFFALO

Preclinical animal testing is conducted under sterile conditions,
using continuous monitoring, at the Laboratory Animal Facilities at the State
University of New York at Buffalo. Hemex employees work at this facility with
the assistance of personnel provided by the University. Veterinary
consultation, technicians for the daily care of the animals, surgical
assistants during experimentation, and post-surgical care are all provided by
the facility. Hemex reimburses the University on an hourly basis for animal
maintenance and experimental assistance.

BUFFALO GENERAL HOSPITAL HEMODIALYSIS CENTER


6



A state of the art facility with 20 hemodialysis stations, the
Hemodialysis Center can serve 120 patients per day. Director of the Center is
Dr. Sidney Anthone, a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Hemex and a
long-time collaborator of Dr. Ambrus. Dr. Anthone has conducted the in vivo
clinical studies of the Hemopurifier completed to date, in collaboration with
Dr. Clara Ambrus.

DEVELOPMENTS TO DATE

A summary of progress to date for each of the four metal
intoxication devices follows:

DFO HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE FOR ALUMINUM. The first clinical trial under
an IDE was completed at the end of 1993, with the results accepted by the FDA
in 1994. The trial showed that the device was safe; a complete lack of
side-effects on the first application, and on repeated applications, was
demonstrated. Furthermore, the device was effective in removing substantial
amounts of aluminum from the blood. See Exhibit "D" for detailed results of
this trial.

In preparation for the application for marketing approval, a second
IDE was requested, and approved in February 1997. This trial will test the
efficacy of aluminum removal during dialysis treatment using the same
treatment schedule that will be recommended for commercial use of the DFO
Hemopurifier.

This clinical trial includes treating patients from three dialysis
centers three times per week for 12 weeks, with each treatment lasting four
hours. A total of 24 patients will be treated, with an equal number of
controls monitored. The focus of the trial will be to demonstrate the
superiority of the Hemopurifier device over present treatment, and to gather
data that will support the cost-effectiveness of this treatment. This trial
will begin in the fourth quarter of 1999.

Upon acceptance by the FDA of the results of this clinical trial,
Hemex will immediately file a PMA application, anticipating approval in the
first quarter of 2001. Sales of the aluminum device will begin as soon as
this approval is received.

The Company will continue to explore alternative expedited
regulatory paths, such as the Product Development Protocol, the Humanitarian
Device Exemption, and the 510K process, for this and subsequent devices.

DFO HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE FOR IRON . During the forthcoming clinical
trial for the aluminum device, excess iron will unavoidably be removed from
patients' blood since the chelator for aluminum and for iron is identical.
Data gathered on iron removal will be an essential part of Hemex submission
to the FDA for approval of the iron Hemopurifier, which will be made at the
earliest opportunity. The FDA may require further clinical testing on a
limited scale, but the approval process may be shorter and less costly than
for the PMA for the initial product.

HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE FOR PLATINUM. The initial prototype of the
Hemopurifier device for platinum has been tested successfully in vitro using
blood of patients which was collected during cisplatin treatment. It was also
tested in animals chiefly for safety. Chelators are now being tested, and an
application for a Phase I Clinical trial will be submitted in the third
quarter of 1999.

HEMOPURIFIER DEVICE FOR LEAD. Resin chelators are being investigated
for their suitability for immobilization, as well as their specificity,
efficiency, availability, and cost. Results from tests in vitro, and in dogs
with experimentally produced lead poisoning, are extremely encouraging in
demonstrating the efficacy of the Hemopurifier approach to lead
detoxification. Once the laboratory work is complete, application to the FDA
for a Phase I Clinical Trial will be submitted in the fourth quarter of 1999.

COMPETITION AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

There are many companies, both public and private, including
well-known pharmaceutical companies, chemical companies and specialized
biotechnology companies, engaged in developing diagnostic products for
certain of the applications being pursued by Hemex. Many of these companies
have substantially greater capital, research and development, manufacturing,
marketing and human resources and experience Company is anticipated to have.
Such companies may develop products more quickly or products that are more
effective and less costly than any that the Company may develop. The industry
in which the Company proposes to compete is characterized by extensive
research efforts and rapid technological changes. New developments are
expected to continue, and there can be no assurance that discoveries by
others will not render the Company's products or potential products
noncompetitive. Competition may increase further as a result of advances that
may be made in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater
availability of capital for investment in these fields.

SUMMARY OF CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TREATMENTS

Management knows of no comparable medical devices either being sold
commercially, or in development, which perform the same function as the
Hemopurifier products. The alternative treatments available to patients today
are described below.

CHELATION. Current treatments for metal intoxications (aluminum,
iron, and lead) involve the administration of specific binding agents, called
chelators, either by injection or orally. The complex formed by the
combination of the chelator and the metal is removed by natural evacuation,
through the kidney or through the intestines. The chelators and
chelator/metal complexes are toxic and can produce such harmful side-effects
as gastrointestinal irritation, hypertension, and kidney injury.

The principal chelators and their manufacturers are identified in
the following table:


7





- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR THE REMOVAL OF: CHELATOR MANUFACTURER
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Aluminum and Iron DFO (Desferrioxamine Mesylate) Novartis (Ciba Geigy)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead EDTA (Calcium Disodium Versenate) 3M Pharmaceutical Co.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead BAL (Dimercaprol) Becton-Dickinson
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead D-penicillamine Merck & Co. and Wallace Laboratories
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead DMSA (Succimer) McNeil Consumer Products
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


HEMOPERFUSION. In this process, blood is passed through a cartridge
containing activated charcoal, which is intended to absorb the metal or
toxin. The principal disadvantages of hemoperfusion are: (1) activated
charcoal is not specific to the targeted toxin, so that other desirable
substances may also be removed from the blood, and (2) blood cells are often
injured when they come in contact with activated charcoal, resulting in
clotting and other harmful side-effects.

The Clark Biocompatible Hemoperfusion System, from Clark Research
and Development, is a general non-specific detoxifier that has been on the
market for over 10 years. Approved for third-party payment, the Clark
cartridge costs $690, and the total treatment about $1,000. The system seems
not to be widely used, with reported sales of just under $300,000.

PLASMAPHERESIS. This procedure involves the separation of plasma
from red blood cells in a separator (an expensive piece of equipment), and
discarding the plasma that contains the intoxicant. The red blood cells are
returned to the body, and the plasma replaced with normal plasma or other
replacement fluids. The major disadvantages of this process are: (1) the
entire plasma is removed in order to remove one harmful component, (2) the
process presents risk of blood pressure fluctuations and fluid overload, and
(3) transmission of infectious agents is possible when the replacement fluid
is human plasma.

EMPLOYEES

As of March 31, 1999, the Company employed three employees, all of
whom were employed on a full-time basis and are considered executive
personnel. None of the Company's employees are covered by a collective
bargaining agreement, the Company has never experienced a work stoppage, and
the Company considers its labor relations to be excellent.

PATENTS

The following patents have been issued to Dr. Clara Ambrus, a
shareholder of the Company and an officer of Hemex, and her collaborators,
with U.S. patents subsequently assigned to Hemex (foreign patent assignments
to Hemex are in process):

REMOVING METAL IONS FROM THE BLOOD




USA: No. 4,612,122 Issued September 16, 1986
Europe: No. 0,073,888 Issued April 23, 1986
Japan: No: 110,047/82 Issued June 7, 1994

BLOOD PURIFICATION

USA: No. 4,714,556 Issued December 22, 1987
USA: No. 4,787,974 Issued November 29, 1988


The claims cover the product itself, the process of manufacture, and
the process of treatment.

On July 25, 1998, Hemex applied for an additional patent on the
proprietary immobilization process used in the Hemopurifier and will soon
apply for other patents covering specific applications of the technology not
covered in the original patents.

REGULATORY APPROVAL

The DFO Hemopurifier device for the removal of aluminum has been
shown to be safe in patient use. The FDA granted an Investigational Device
Exemption (IDE) in 1993 for a clinical trial to test the safety of the device
in six patients. The trial was completed in late 1993, and the results
accepted by the FDA in 1994. The trial confirmed that the product and process
are completely safe in vivo; a lack of side effects on the first, and
subsequent applications, was clearly demonstrated. Furthermore, the results
confirmed that the device is very effective in removing aluminum from the
blood.

In preparation for application for pre-marketing approval (PMA) from
the FDA, a second IDE was granted on February 20, 1997. This trial will
confirm the safety of the device, as well as establish its clinical
effectiveness in removing aluminum. The approved trial will employ the
treatment protocol to be used when the device is sold commercially, and will
involve 48 patients in three medical centers: Buffalo General Hospital
(Buffalo, NY), Beth Israel Hospital (New York, NY), and Millard Fillmore
Hospital (Buffalo, NY). Twenty-four patients treated with the Hemopurifier
device will be compared to twenty-four untreated dialysis patients having the
same levels of aluminum. In the treatment group, Hemopurifier devices will be
applied simultaneously with every dialysis (i.e. three times per week, four
hours per treatment, for three months. This trial will begin in the third
quarter of 1999.


8



Upon receipt of FDA approval to proceed, PMA submissions for both
the aluminum application and the iron application will be made as soon as
possible. Since the identical device removes both aluminum and iron, it is
expected that data recorded during the forthcoming clinical trial will
expedite FDA approval of the application for treatment of iron overload
conditions.

Removal of lead and platinum intoxications by a device with a resin
chelator has been tested successfully in vivo in animals, and work is
underway to prepare for IDE applications for these products. No significant
development issues remain in either case, and moving to initial clinical
trials is largely a matter of procuring funding to do so. The FDA approval
process for these applications should be expedited by the fact that the
identical device removes both lead and platinum.

FDA APPROVAL AND OTHER REGULATIONS

The development, manufacture, and marketing of Hemex products are
subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by the FDA. Initial clinical
trials for the first product Hemex plans to bring to market, the DFO
Hemopurifier device for aluminum, have been completed under the FDA's IDE
(Investigational Device Exemption) regulations. These trials have been
accepted by the FDA, enabling Hemex to proceed to a final round of clinical
trials under a second IDE granted in February 1997. Upon successful
completion of that trial, application for pre-marketing approval can proceed.

The process of obtaining FDA and other approvals for medical devices
is generally lengthy and expensive, and the outcome often unpredictable.
There can be no assurance that Hemex can ultimately obtain the necessary
approvals to market its products. And, if regulatory approvals are granted,
they may include specific limitations on indicated uses for which the
products may be marketed.

Changes in existing regulations, or the adoption of new regulations,
could prevent Hemex from obtaining future regulatory approvals, or delay
substantially required approvals. No assurance can be given that new
legislation or regulations, or changes in the enforcement of existing
regulations, will not have a material adverse impact on Hemex's ability to
achieve the results expected and the success of the Company.

PATENT PROTECTION AND PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY

Hemex has developed proprietary technology, and has broad patents
relating to aspects of its technology. Furthermore, Hemex has applied for
additional patents on elements of its technology and applications. Hemex
believes these patents are important to its ultimate success.

However, there can be no assurance that additional patents will be
issued or, if issued and challenged, will be ultimately determined to be
valid. There is no assurance that the Company can maintain the secrecy of any
proprietary technology. Furthermore, issued patents may not prevent
infringement claims against Hemex, nor prevent others from infringing upon
those patents. Defense and prosecution of patent claims can be expensive and
time-consuming, especially for a small company, even if the outcome is
favorable.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The Company currently rents approximately 2,000 square feet of
laboratory space from the University of Buffalo Foundation on a
month-to-month basis at a lease rate of approximately $2,640 per month. The
Company also leases approximately 1,200 square feet of executive office space
in La Jolla, California at the rate of $1,540 per month on a month-to-month
basis for use as its principal executive offices.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings, and the Company is
not aware of any threatened legal proceedings to which the Company may be a
party.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's security
holders during the period covered by the report.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

LIMITED PUBLIC MARKET FOR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

The Company's Common Stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board ("OTCBB"). The Company's trading symbol is "BSEQ." The
Company's Common Stock has had a limited trading history, and trading has
been limited and sporadic.

The following table sets forth for the period indicated the high and low
bid quotations for the Common Stock as reported by the OTCBB. The prices
represent quotations between dealers, without adjustment for retail markup,
mark down or commission, and do not necessarily represent actual transactions.


9





1999 HIGH BID LOW BID
1st Quarter $10.00 $7.75

1998
4th Quarter $ 9.50 $7.50
3rd Quarter $ 9.50 $5.50
2nd Quarter $ 9.50 $5.50
1st Quarter $10.50 $5.50

1997
4th Quarter $10.50 $5.50
3rd Quarter $10.50 $5.50
2nd Quarter $10.50 $5.50



There are approximately 100 record holders of the Company's Common
Stock.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

PLAN OF OPERATION

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
report.

The Company is in the initial stages of its operations and has not
yet engaged in any commercial activities. During the fiscal 2000, the Company
plans to continue its research and development activities relating to the
Hemopurifier, commence manufacturing, and commence marketing and sales
activities. See Item 1, "Business."

The implementation of the Company's business plan is dependent upon
its ability to raise capital. The Company has undertaken a private placement
of $750,000 principal amount of 12-month notes bearing interest at 12% per
annum. The Company has also received a letter from an investment banker
agreeing to use its best efforts to sell $5.0 million to $7.0 million of the
Company's Common Stock in a private placement anticipated to commence in
September 1999. The Company believes that the successful completion of these
offerings will satisfy the Company's anticipated capital requirements related
to the development of the Hemex business for three years; however, additional
financing may be required in the case of further acquisitions or to
successfully develop other other technologies. At the present time, the
Company has no plans to purchase significant amounts of equipment or hire
significant numbers of additional employees until the successful completion
of the private placement of its Common Stock. The Company has no plant
purchases scheduled during the next 12 months.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS

The Company is a development stage entity and during the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1999 had no revenue compared to revenue in the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1998 of $20,000. Revenue from inception (January 31, 1984) to
March 31, 1999 totals $1,568,000, of which $1,424,000 was grant income.

Expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 were $352,000
compared to expenses of $494,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998.
Expenses from inception to March 31, 1999 were $5,009,000.

The net loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 was $353,000
($.23 per share) compared to $492,000 ($.39 per share) for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1998. The loss from inception to March 31, 1999 is $3,447,000
($2.67 per share).

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to
Financial Statements are attached hereto and filed as a part of this Report
under Item 13.

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

The registrant has dismissed its former principal accountant, Jody M.
Weber, C.P.A., effective June 15, 1999.

During the two most recent fiscal years of the registrant and each
subsequent interim period preceding June 15, 1999, there were no disagreements
with the former accountant on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure of any reportable
events.

The reports of the former principal accountant on the financial
statements of the registrant for the fiscal years ended March 31, 1998 and 1997
did not contain qualified opinions.


10



The registrant's Board of Directors has approved the decision to
change accountants.

On June 15, 1999, the registrant engaged Freed, Maxick, Sachs &
Murphy, PC as its principal accountant.


PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Company's officers, directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a
registered class of the Company's equity securities to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") and Nasdaq. Officers, directors, and greater than 10%
beneficial owners are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. The Company believes that all
filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors, and greater than
10% beneficial owners were complied with.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES

The names, ages and positions of the Company's Directors and
executive officers as of March 31, 1999 are listed below:




NAMES TITLE OR POSITION AGE


James A. Joyce Chairman, Secretary, and Director 37

Franklyn S. Barry, Jr. President/Chief Executive Officer, 59
Interim Chief Financial Officer,
and Director

Edward G. Broenniman Director 63


Resumes of Management follow:

FRANKLYN S. BARRY, JR., PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, INTERIM
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AND DIRECTOR

Mr. Barry has over 25 years of experience in managing and building
companies. He has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hemex
since April 1997. From 1994 to April 1997, Mr. Barry was a private
consultant. Included among his prior experiences are tenures as President of
Fisher-Price and as co-founder and CEO of Software Distribution Services,
which today operates as Ingram Micro-D, an international distributor of
personal computer products. Mr. Barry serves on the Board of Directors of
both publicly-traded and privately-owned businesses in several different
industries. Mr. Barry received a B.A. from Harvard College and an M.B.A. from
the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.

JAMES A. JOYCE, CHAIRMAN, SECRETARY, AND DIRECTOR

Mr. Joyce is the founder of Aethlon, Inc. Since 1993, Mr. Joyce has
served as the Chief Executive Officer of James Joyce & Associates, a
management consulting and investment banking organization that specializes in
the structure and placement of private and public equity offerings. Most
recently, he advised in the structure and placement of over $20 million in
private equity on behalf of a publicly-traded computer distribution company,
and served as a board member and advisor in the initial public offering of a
biomedical company. Previously, Mr. Joyce was Chief Executive Officer of
Mission Labs, Inc. and a principal in charge of U.S. operations for London
Zurich Securities, Ltd. Mr. Joyce received a B.A. from the University of
Maryland.

EDWARD G. BROENNIMAN, DIRECTOR

Mr. Broenniman has 30 years of management and executive experience with
high-tech, privately-held growth firms where he has served as a CEO, COO, or
corporate advisor, using his expertise to focus management on increasing
profitability and stockholder value. Mr. Broenniman recently served on the
Board of Directors of publicly-traded QuesTech (acquired by CACI
International), and currently serves on the Boards of four privately-held
firms, the Dingham Center for Entrepreneurship's Board of Advisors at the
University of Maryland, and the Board of the Association for Corporate
Growth. Mr. Broenniman holds an M.B.A. degree from Stanford University and a
B.A. degree from Yale University.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, no officer of the
Company received compensation in excess of $100,000. Franklyn S. Barry, Jr.,
the Company's Chief Executive Officer, was entitled to receive a salary of
$108,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999; however, he received only
$18,000 of the salary due him and has deferred the balance owing.


11



In April 1999, the Company entered into three-year employment
agreements with James A. Joyce, the Company's Chairman of the Board, and Mr.
Barry. Mr. Joyce's agreement provides for base compensation of $108,000 per
year, and Mr. Barry's agreement provides for base compensation of $120,000
per year. The agreements also provide that the employees are eligible to
receive the Company's standard benefits package and participation in an
incentive compensation program approved by the Board of Directors.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the
Company's officers, directors, and persons who own more than five percent of
the Company's common stock as of the date June 28, 1999.




Percent
Number of
Name Title of Shares (1) Class
- ---- ----- ------------- -------

James A. Joyce Chairman, Secretary, 675,400 26.0%
and Director

Franklyn S. Barry, Jr. President/Chief Executive 418,593 (2) 13.9% (2)
Officer, Interim Chief Financial
Officer, and Director

Edward G. Broenniman Director 255,874 (3) 9.9%

Clara Ambrus Chief Scientific Officer and 450,279 17.4%
Director of Hemex

Deborah Salerno Shareholder 425,000 16.4%

Thomas Wolf Shareholder 131,820 5.1%

All directors and executive 1,349,867 (4) 44.9% (4)
officers of Company as a group
(3 persons)


- ------------------------
(1) Assumes 2,595,000 shares outstanding based on the exchange of all of
the shares of Aethlon and Hemex in accordance with the Aethlon and Hemex
Agreements.

(2) Includes 412,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of
presently-exercisable non-qualified stock options which the Company has
agreed to issue; however, no agreement has been executed as of the date
of this report. The percentage ownership for Mr. Barry is based on
3,007,500 shares outstanding, assuming the exercise of the 412,500
options.

(3) Includes 201,989 shares owned of record by Linda Broenniman, Mr.
Broenniman's wife.

(4) Includes 412,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of
presently-exercisable incentive stock options held by Mr. Barry. The
percentage ownership is based on 3,007,500 shares outstanding, assuming
the exercise of the 412,500 options.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

None.

12



ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report on Form 10-KSB:

1. Financial Statements for the periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998:

Independent Auditors' Reports
Statements of Operations
Balance Sheet
Statements of Cash Flows
Statements of Stockholders' Deficiency
Notes to Financial Statements

2. Exhibits

The following exhibits are being filed with this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB and/or are incorporated by reference therein in accordance with
the designated footnote references:

3.1 Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company (1)

10.1 Employment Agreement between the Company and Franklyn S. Barry, Jr.
dated April 1, 1999.

10.2 Employment Agreement between the Company and James A. Joyce dated
April 1, 1999.

10.3 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization Between the Registrant and
Aethlon, Inc. dated March 10, 1999 (2)

10.4 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization Between the Registrant and
Hemex dated March 10, 1999 (2)

23.1 Independent Auditors' Consent - Freed, Maxick, Sachs & Murphy, P.C.

27 Financial Data Schedule Worksheet

- ------------------------

(1) Filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 and
incorporated by reference.

(2) Filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 10, 1999.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.

Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 1999 (filed with the SEC
on March 15, 1999) relating to the Aethlon and Hemex Reorganizations.

Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated March 10, 1999 (filed with the SEC
on May 25, 1999) relating to the Aethlon and Hemex Reorganizations.

Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 1999 (filed with the SEC on
June 21, 1999) relating to the change of the Company's independent
auditors.

Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated June 15, 1999 filed on July 12,
1999 relating to the change of the Company's independent auditors.


13




SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on the 15th day of July 1999.


By: /s/Franklyn S. Barry, Jr.
----------------------------
Franklyn S. Barry, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer


In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.




SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

/s/James A. Joyce Chairman of the Board July 15, 1999
- --------------------------- Secretary, Director
James A. Joyce


/s/Franklyn S. Barry, Jr. Chief Executive Officer, July 15, 1999
- --------------------------- President, Interim Chief
Franklyn S. Barry, Jr. Financial Officer, Director
(Principal Accounting Officer)


- --------------------------- Director July ___, 1999
Edward G. Broenniman








14
















CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL REPORT

BISHOP EQUITIES, INC.
(D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MARCH 31, 1999




BISHOP EQUITIES, INC.
(D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)


CONTENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Pages
-----

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT................................................................. 1


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

Statements of Operations.................................................................. 2

Balance Sheets............................................................................ 3

Statements of Cash Flows.................................................................. 4

Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency..................................................... 5


NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS........................................................... 6 - 11




INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


To the Board of Directors
Bishop Equities, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Buffalo, New York


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bishop
Equities, Inc. (d/b/a Aethlon Medical, Inc.) and Subsidiaries (A Development
Stage Enterprise) as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years
then ended and for the period from January 31, 1984 (inception) to March 31,
1999. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bishop
Equities, Inc. (d/b/a Aethlon Medical, Inc.) and Subsidiaries (A Development
Stage Enterprise) as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and from January 31, 1984
(inception) to March 31, 1999 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations and its total liabilities exceed its total assets. This raises
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


FREED MAXICK SACHS & MURPHY, P.C.


Buffalo, New York
June 18, 1999


1

BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CUMULATIVE
DURING
DEVELOPMENT
STAGE THROUGH
1999 1998 MARCH 31, 1999
------------- ------------- --------------

REVENUE:
Grant income $ - $ - $ 1,424,012
Subcontract income - - 73,746
Sale of research and development - 2,810 35,810
Other income - 17,225 17,225
Interest income - - 17,415
------------- ------------- -------------
Total revenue - 20,035 1,568,208

EXPENSES:
Personnel costs 221,779 295,678 2,847,496
Professional fees 45,887 50,501 316,980
Rent and utilities 32,429 37,916 255,889
Depreciation 16,287 17,423 123,820
Interest 13,823 34,211 90,761
Amortization 8,171 8,171 34,727
Office expense 5,715 3,150 159,798
Travel and meetings 5,325 22,077 117,417
Miscellaneous 3,131 4,121 98,303
Equipment and maintenance 1,674 46 164,699
Laboratory supplies 180 12,055 99,733
Research and development consultation - 25,548 240,463
Subcontract expense - - 195,964
Contractual costs - - 192,112
Dues and subscription - - 13,596
Insurance (2,347) 2,769 57,311
------------- ------------- -------------
Total expenses 352,054 513,666 5,009,069
------------- ------------- -------------

Loss before income tax provision (benefit) (352,054) (493,631) (3,440,861)

Income tax provision (benefit) 625 (1,759) 6,173
------------- -------------- -------------

NET LOSS $ (352,679) $ (491,872) $ (3,447,034)
------------- -------------- -------------
------------- -------------- -------------

PER SHARE:
Net loss $ (.23) $ (.39) $ (2.67)

------------- -------------- -------------
------------- -------------- -------------
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding 1,506,833 1,274,000 1,289,352
------------- -------------- -------------
------------- -------------- -------------


See accompanying notes.

2


BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31,

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------




ASSETS 1999 1998
------------- -------------

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash $ 3,052 $ 1,232
------------- ------------
Total current assets 3,052 1,232

EQUIPMENT, NET 33,608 49,895

PATENTS, NET 45,413 53,584
------------- ------------

TOTAL ASSETS $ 82,073 $ 104,711
------------- ------------
------------- ------------

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable:
Trade $ 252,178 $ 197,096
Related parties 158,306 180,158
Deferred compensation 310,008 -
Accrued liabilities 63,577 53,713
Due to stockholder 2,500 -
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities 786,569 430,967

DEFERRED COMPENSATION - 411,672

LOANS PAYABLE - STOCKHOLDERS - 367,883

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY:
Common stock - $.001 par value, 25,000,000
shares authorized, 2,595,000 (1,274,000 - 1998)
shares issued and outstanding 2,595 1,274
Additional paid in capital 2,739,943 1,987,270
Deficit accumulated during development stage (3,447,034) (3,094,355)
-------------- --------------
Total stockholders' deficiency (704,496) (1,105,811)
-------------- --------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY $ 82,073 $ 104,711
------------- --------------
------------- --------------



See accompanying notes.

3
BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CUMULATIVE
DURING
DEVELOPMENT
STAGE THROUGH
1999 1998 MARCH 31, 1999
------------- ------------- --------------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (352,679) $(491,872) $(3,447,034)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation 16,287 17,423 123,820
Amortization 8,171 8,171 34,727
Deferred compensation forgiven 37,600 75,200 217,223
Decrease in assets:
Prepaid insurance - 4,909 -
Increase in liabilities:
Accounts payable 12,838 104,228 390,634
Accrued expenses 77,074 18,918 130,815
Deferred compensation 77,959 109,935 310,007
------------- ------------- -------------
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES (122,750) (153,088) (2,239,808)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment - - (157,428)
Purchase of patents - - (80,740)
------------- ------------- --------------
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES - - (238,168)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loans from stockholders - 120,000 370,384
Advance from affiliate 122,100 - 122,100
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 2,470 22,000 1,988,544
------------- ------------- -------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 124,570 142,000 2,481,028
------------- ------------- -------------

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 1,820 (11,088) 3,052
Cash - beginning of year 1,232 12,320 -
------------- ------------- -------------
Cash - end of year $ 3,052 $ 1,232 $ 3,052
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH
FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ - $ - $ 23,580
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------

Income taxes $ 325 $ 1,097 $ 5,812
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loans converted to common stock $ 435,094 $ - $ 435,094
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------

Net assets of entities acquired in exchange
for the issuance of common stock $ 119,014 $ - $ 119,014
------------- ------------- -------------
------------- ------------- -------------

See accompanying notes.

4


BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMON STOCK
-------------------------- PAID IN ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT TOTAL
------------ --------- ------------- --------------- --------------

BALANCE AT APRIL 1, 1997 1,274,000 $ 1,274 $ 1,987,270 $ (2,602,483) $ (613,939)

Net loss - 1998 - - - (491,872) (491,872)
------------ --------- ------------- --------------- --------------

BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 1998 1,274,000 1,274 1,987,270 (3,094,355) (1,105,811)

Conversion of loans payable -
stockholders into Hemex
common stock (Note 6) 76,000 76 435,018 - 435,094

Issuance of common stock for
acquisition of Bishop (Note 3) 511,500 511 (2,437) - (1,926)

Issuance of common stock for
acquisition of Aethlon (Note 3) 733,500 734 102,869 - 103,603

Forgiven employee/stockholder
deferred compensation (Note 5) - - 217,223 - 217,223

Net loss - 1999 - - - (352,679) (352,679)
------------ --------- ------------- --------------- --------------

BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 1999 2,595,000 $ 2,595 $ 2,739,943 $ (3,447,034) $ (704,496)
------------ --------- ------------- --------------- --------------
------------ --------- ------------- --------------- --------------



See accompanying notes.

5


BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STATE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 1. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION - The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Bishop Equities, Inc. (doing business as Aethlon Medical Inc.)
(Bishop) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Hemex, Inc. (Hemex) and Aethlon,
Inc. (Aethlon) (collectively the Company). All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated.

NATURE OF BUSINESS - Bishop, which was formerly a non-operating public
shell, is the parent company to Aethlon and Hemex. Aethlon was incorporated on
June 24, 1998 to acquire proprietary medical device technologies with the
ability to be developed and commercialized on an international basis. Hemex was
incorporated on January 31, 1984 and is a start-up research and development
company involved in developing the Hemopurifier-TM- which is a medical device
which removes toxic metals present in the bloodstream.

To date the Company is in the initial stage of its operations and has
not yet engaged in any commercial activities. Marketing of the Hemopurifier is
subject to FDA approval.

ESTIMATES - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and receipts and expenditures during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from estimates.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - The carrying amounts of the
current assets and liabilities reported in the balance sheets approximate fair
value due to their short term maturity.

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS CHANGES - Effective fiscal 1998, the Company
adopted SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments and Related Information, which
establishes standards for the way public companies report information about
operating segments in both interim and annual financial statements and related
disclosures. The Company is currently organized, managed and internally reported
as one segment. The segment operates entirely within the United States.

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - In accordance with SFAS 128, dual
presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share is required on the face of
the statement of operations. Net loss per share is based upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented.
Outstanding stock options, warrants and convertible debentures have not been
considered common stock equivalents because their assumed exercise would be
anti-dilutive.


6


BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STATE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 1. - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

EQUIPMENT AND DEPRECIATION - Equipment is recorded at cost.
Depreciation has been determined using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciation expense for the years ended
March 31, 1999 and 1998 was $16,287 and $17,423, respectively. Accumulated
depreciation as of March 31, 1999 and 1998 amounted to $123,820 and $107,532,
respectively.

PATENTS AND AMORTIZATION - Three patents were acquired during the year
ended December 31, 1994 from a stockholder in exchange for a note payable in the
amount of $80,140. The patents are being amortized on the straight-line method
over their remaining lives which expire between the years 2003 through 2005.
Amortization for each of the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 was $8,171.
Accumulated amortization as of March 31, 1999 and 1998 amounted to $34,727 and
$26,556, respectively.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENTAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL COSTS - Research,
developmental and organizational costs are expensed as incurred.

INCOME TAXES - Income taxes are computed in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
Deferred taxes are provided on temporary differences arising from assets and
liabilities whose bases are different for financial reporting and income tax
purposes. Differences in basis for which deferred taxes are provided relate
primarily to costs associated with research and development.


NOTE 2. - FINANCIAL CONDITION

On March 10, 1999, Bishop acquired the outstanding stock of two
privately held Development Stage Enterprises, Hemex and Aethlon, in order to
pursue its commitment to become a significant developer and manufacturer of
medical device technologies (see Note 3). Hemex has developed a proprietary and
patented technology for the extracorporeal removal of toxic materials from the
blood, and has completed its first clinical trial of one application of this
technology. Aethlon was formed as a medical device acquisition company, whose
mission will now be carried forward by Bishop. Management intends to seek other
acquisitions in related medical device technologies while in the near term
concentrating on the commercialization of the Hemex Hemopurifier-TM- product
line. It is expected that, subject to FDA approval, commercialization of this
product will begin on a limited basis in late 2000.


7

BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STATE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 2. - FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED)

Since the acquisition of Hemex and Aethlon, the Company has undertaken
an offering of short term debt in the amount of $750,000. Proceeds from this
offering are expected to be available in July 1999. The Company has also
received a letter from a major investment bank agreeing to use its best efforts
in leading the private placement of the Company's common stock in the amount of
$5 million to $7 million beginning in September 1999. Management believes that
the financing provided by these two offerings, should they be completed, will be
sufficient to meet the Company's cash needs, including the commercialization of
the Hemopurifier-TM- products, for at least three years. Additional financing
may be required in the case of further acquisitions.

Management has several strategies for the conservation of capital while
it is a Development Stage Enterprise. Management will invest principally in
research and product development, and to a lesser extent in marketing, planning
and development. Strategic partnerships and subcontracting relationships are
planned for direct sales, distribution and manufacturing activities related to
the Hemex product line. Careful management of general and administrative
expenses, including the use of part-time experts in specific functions, will
minimize "burn rate" during the pre-revenue phase.

The Company has sustained substantial operating losses in recent years,
and expects to do so for two additional years. Also, its current liabilities
exceed its current assets by $763,710 at March 31, 1999. Management believes
that the actions described above will provide the basis for the Company to
transition from a Development Stage Enterprise and commence principal
operations, but can offer no assurances that its present plans will be
sufficiently successful to enable the Company to continue to operate as a going
concern.


NOTE 3. - CAPITAL TRANSACTION

In February 1999, Bishop (a non-operating public shell) entered into a
merger agreement with Hemex and Aethlon whereby Bishop issued 1,350,000 and
733,500 shares of its common stock to Hemex and Aethlon, respectively, in
exchange for 100% of their outstanding shares. Hemex and Aethlon survived as the
operating entities and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Bishop. Bishop, who is
currently doing business as Aethlon Medical, Inc., is in the process of formally
changing its name to Aethlon Medical, Inc..

As a result of the merger, the Hemex shareholders became the majority
owners of the Company and have effective operating control. Accordingly, the
transaction has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition whereby Hemex is
deemed to be the accounting acquirer of Bishop and Aethlon through the issuance
of stock for their net monetary assets, followed by a recapitalization. The
assets and liabilities of Aethlon and Bishop have been recorded at their
historical cost, which approximated their fair market value. The results of
operations include those of Bishop and Aethlon since the date of acquisition.
Hemex has changed its fiscal year end from December 31 to that of Bishop, with
Aethlon also adopting Bishop's fiscal year.


8

BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STATE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 3. - CAPITAL TRANSACTION (CONTINUED)

The following is a proforma summary of the results of operations had
Hemex, Bishop and Aethlon been combined as of April 1, 1997:



1999 1998
------------- -------------

Net loss $ (465,428) $ (495,471)
------------- -------------
------------- -------------



NOTE 4. - LEASES

The Company rents laboratory space from the University of Buffalo
Foundation on a month to month basis. Total rent expense for the years ended
March 31, 1999 and 1998 was $32,429 and $37,916, respectively.


NOTE 5. - DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The Company has accrued but unpaid compensation obligations (deferred
compensation) with two of its present officers/stockholders and two stockholders
who are former officers. The Company has entered into an agreement with the
individuals, the terms of which require the Company to compensate the
individuals the amount owed as soon as the Company has funds available. To
facilitate the capital transaction described in Note 3, the employees have
agreed to accept a discounted amount as full payment of the deferred
compensation. As a result, the deferred compensation liability presented in the
accompanying financial statements has been discounted by 40 percent, reflecting
the amount of funds management estimates will be available from a proposed
private placement (see Note 2) to satisfy the payment of the deferred
compensation. The amounts discounted and forgiven by the employee/stockholders
in the amount of $217,223 have been recorded as an increase in additional paid
in capital at March 31, 1999.


NOTE 6. - LOANS PAYABLE - STOCKHOLDERS

As of March 31, 1998, the Company had convertible loans
payable to certain stockholders of Hemex aggregating $367,883. The loans accrued
interest at rates ranging from 8% to 14%. The loans were convertible into shares
of Hemex common stock at the rate of one share per $250 of outstanding loan
balance. At December 31, 1998, outstanding loan balances of $367,883 along with
accrued interest of $67,211 were converted into 1,740 shares of Hemex's common
stock. Interest expense related to these loans for the years ended March 31,
1999 and 1998 amounted to $13,823 and $34,211, respectively.


9


BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STATE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 7. - INCOME TAXES

The Company has elected under Internal Revenue Code, Section 174, to
capitalize for income tax purposes all research and development expenditures
incurred in conjunction with its product development process. Net costs
associated with the research and development process amount to approximately
$3,224,000 at March 31, 1999. When the Company realizes benefits from such
expenditures, the costs will be amortized over a period of 60 months.

A valuation allowance has been provided for 100 percent of the deferred
tax asset as realization of the asset is contingent upon Food and Drug
Administration approval of the HemopurifierTM and the Company generating
sufficient taxable income to offset the research and development amortization
expenses.

The Company's deferred tax assets as of March 31, 1999 and 1998 consist
of:



MARCH 31,
-------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------- -------------

FEDERAL:
Deferred tax asset $ 484,110 $ 437,074
Valuation allowance 484,110 437,074
------------- -------------

$ - $ -
------------- -------------
------------- -------------

STATE:
Deferred tax asset $ 258,192 $ 233,106
Valuation allowance 258,192 233,106
------------- -------------

Net deferred tax asset $ - $ -
------------- -------------
------------- -------------


NOTE 8. - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In addition to the stockholder loans payable, the officers of the
Company and other related entities regularly pay expenses on behalf of the
Company. The officers also advance the Company funds to cover short-term working
capital shortages. These non interest-bearing amounts have been included as
accounts payable - related parties in the accompanying financial statements.


10


BISHOP EQUITIES, INC. (D/B/A AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.)
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A DEVELOPMENT STATE ENTERPRISE)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, the Company entered into an
agreement to issue up to $750,000 of debt in units of $25,000 in a private
placement offering. Each unit will contain a 12% interest rate and warrants to
purchase 12,500 shares of common stock at a price of five dollars per share for
a five-year term. The warrants may be called by the Company upon meeting certain
per share market price goals.








11